Yesterday a billionaire launched his car into space on a $90 million rocket. It was a fun publicity stunt, sure – but some are bemoaning the lack of any scientific value to the launch.
That billionaire is of course Elon Musk, who launched his Tesla car on the test flight of the Falcon Heavy rocket. Thanks to a bigger than expected boost from the rocket’s upper stage, the car is now on its way to the asteroid belt in an orbit that may last a billion years.
And on board the car? Well, there was a mannequin called “Starman” wearing SpaceX’s new spacesuit, a disk containing Isaac Asimov’s Foundation trilogy, and a small message on a circuit board declaring the car was “made on Earth by humans”.
That, however, was it. And there’s a bit of annoyance that SpaceX did not include anything else on this launch, such as some student-led experiments or projects, or some other satellites. The science that could have been afforded on such a trip, to some, would have been extremely worthwhile.
“I do see this as a missed opportunity,” Infinite Dimensions CEO Jeffrey Wallace, a US government contractor developing advanced navigation systems, told IFLScience.
“First, there is the whole access to space for experiments, and what opportunities there are receive a lot of attention and vetting. Second was the opportunity for SpaceX to be exposed to potential new technology partners to see what they could do with no real investment on their part.”
For example, the six-hour coast on the rocket’s upper stage sent the car through the Van Allen belt, a scientifically interesting region of radiation surrounding Earth. It’ll also pass the orbit of Mars and enter the asteroid belt, where a telescope on board could have checked out some asteroids.
There are likely many reasons SpaceX did not include something of scientific value (they have not yet responded to a request for comment). One would be continued management of the mission after the launch; as it is now, the Tesla has simply been left to wander through space alone.
Another is the oft-cited Musk quip that the rocket had a decent chance of exploding. He repeatedly said that other rocket test flights included only “concrete blocks” as dummy weights. Why not have more fun and send a car?
That’s not strictly true, though, as a number of test flights have included useful payloads. The Ariane 5 in 1996, for example, included four ESA spacecraft known as Cluster (although the rocket exploded on its way to orbit). The Atlas V’s first flight in 2002, meanwhile, launched a group of satellites called Hot Bird 6.
The Falcon Heavy’s main competitor, the Delta IV Heavy (half as powerful and four times more expensive, mind), did fly a dummy spacecraft as a payload on its first launch in 2004 – but it also carried a few useful satellites built by students, too. SpaceX even included something useful on its first Falcon 9 launch in 2010 – a prototype Dragon spacecraft.
Wallace, for his part, said he had a shoebox-sized deep space navigation system that could have ridden shotgun with Starman on Falcon Heavy. Plenty of others, too, would no doubt have jumped at the opportunity – even with the “50-50” risk of explosion.
Of course, there is another side to the argument. It is (mostly) Musk’s money, and it is Musk’s company. True, they’ve had considerable funding from the US government, and they are leasing launch pads from NASA. But why shouldn’t he do what he wants?
The launch of the car was, without a doubt, fun. I’ve had plenty of non-space friends talk to me about the launch, who otherwise wouldn’t have been interested. And, to boot, it was the biggest launch in more than a generation. That deserves plenty of praise.
And there’s little doubt about the significance of the launch. Falcon Heavy is now the most powerful rocket in operation today, and the biggest to launch (in terms of payload it can lift) since the Saturn V’s final launch in 1973.
Still, it might have been nice to see something else on the rocket too, alongside the car. And yes, everyone has already made the same joke.